This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
工作学习 / 专业技术讨论 / COBOL or C++, who will die first?
-mikesmith(老猫);
2005-6-15
{2007}
(#2347784@0)
-
Common Business-Oriented Language 有其发展的特殊性，有其应用的局限性。现在计算机技术在大众生活中的广泛应用( 以嵌入式系统应用为代表）使得象C 和C++这种高效，可扩展的，既高级又 贴近计算机体系结构的语言有着极广泛应用和强大的生命力。
-keepbugging(独行的猫);
2005-6-15
{158}
(#2347956@0)
-
there isn't a war between COBOL and C++. they both have different reponsibility to the computer programming world, don't they?they should live their life well in their particular domains, shouldn't they? though C++ probably has a slightly better day than COBOL.
-dotod(Hewllet Greger);
2005-6-15
{136}
(#2348321@0)
-
Cobol will not die, but it will be transformed to C, if not ++. There are more lines of COBOL in this world than C/C++? I don't know how they counted it, but if this is right it can only prove that COBOL is verbose.
-aka(棒棒);
2005-6-15
(#2348639@0)
-
There is OO Cobol. May not a cool option though. Cobol is verbose for sure - That's exactly its strength.
-mikesmith(老猫);
2005-6-15
{1110}
(#2348747@0)
-
Cobol code is not easier to understand than C. because of 1. it takes more lines of code to express the same logic 2. more global variables.
-aka(棒棒);
2005-6-16
(#2350596@0)
-
COBOL 有很多GOLBAL VARIABLE吗?在WORKING STORAGE中定义的变量应该是属局部变量,在COMMONAREA中定义的应该就是你说的GOLBAL VARIABLE,但比起C不算是很多的了
-bzzl(折柳);
2005-6-16
(#2350659@0)
-
It seems there are many 大侠 in this 论坛... very niceI thought most people would agree that Cobol is easier to understand from the language structure perspective, as it is not that powerful as C, and Cobol is not at system level programming....Of course, case by case, there are always exceptions....
-mikesmith(老猫);
2005-6-16
{247}
(#2350702@0)