This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
工作学习 / 专业技术讨论 / what do u guys think of the future of c++, including MFC, STL, Unix, windows, socket programing. and in which field c++ is used most right now and in the future
-toronto_fun(BeMyself);
2005-6-9
(#2337012@0)
-
C++ is going to die someday, because it is stupidly complicate, and poorly designed. just need a push though.
-canadiantire(轮胎-M.I.N.K.);
2005-6-9
(#2337031@0)
-
i agree c++ will die someday, but how long, 5 yr or ten yr? Java will die, .net will dis as well.
-toronto_fun(BeMyself);
2005-6-9
(#2337341@0)
-
Still remember FORTH? LISP, PROLOG may be more widely used for a time. But they are pretty much dead.
-mikesmith(老猫);
2005-6-9
{1257}
(#2337999@0)
-
不知道坛子里还有这样一位老前辈。
-aka(棒棒);
2005-6-9
(#2338441@0)
-
Thanks! Just too lazy to learn new stuff. May not be that old.
-mikesmith(老猫);
2005-6-10
(#2339472@0)
-
what's your opinion against the implementation of OO in the business/application world?
-aka(棒棒);
2005-6-10
(#2339807@0)
-
I have nothing against OO in any sense.In fact, I was quite excited about it during the early years. But I think there is no "one fits all". And if the structual code is working well with the business logic, let it be. For a time, we spent too much time to see how to apply the object model to describle what is a sequential logic.
-mikesmith(老猫);
2005-6-13
{294}
(#2344198@0)
-
Have you ever seen an OO"d ATM or Branch or Store or SKU etc in the real world?
-aka(棒棒);
2005-6-14
(#2346485@0)
-
OO may not fit all, but sure it has its place to live. May have more places than we wanted
-mikesmith(老猫);
2005-6-14
(#2346501@0)
-
I bet you like KISS and UNIX
-goodchoice(body builder);
2005-6-12
(#2342139@0)
-
Thanks. I do.
-mikesmith(老猫);
2005-6-13
(#2344200@0)
-
这是本马今夜睡觉前读到的好贴！谢先！本马跟这头老猫属差不多一个时期的，搞过PROLOG，也搞过LISP，(还记得专家系统、人工干预、人工智能这些“古董”吗？？？)，倍感亲切。。。。本马下先，明天见。
-maer(马儿);
2005-6-12
(#2342326@0)
-
“FORTH? LISP, PROLOG may be more widely used"? 你所说的这几种语言哪一个能与C++的广泛程度相比？ 你老还是歇着吧。
-keepbugging(独行的猫);
2005-6-14
(#2346272@0)
-
how about COBOL?
-mikesmith(老猫);
2005-6-14
(#2346362@0)
-
What's your point?
-keepbugging(独行的猫);
2005-6-15
(#2347409@0)
-
I think C++ will be alive at least in the telecom industry which requires the highest performance and reliability. Look at the the ACE library and you will find the easiest and most powerful development way of C++ application
-henryxy(亨利大帝);
2005-6-12
(#2342300@0)
-
also for os kernel development, embedded and real-time application.
-goodchoice(body builder);
2005-6-13
(#2343377@0)
-
C/C++ is not easy to learn compared with Java/.Net. However after you master it you will treat it as the best language. Also, a C/C++ programmer can understand the system and architecture very well.
-henryxy(亨利大帝);
2005-6-12
(#2342388@0)
-
Well, i am not a master of C++ but i am fairly familiar with it. I just don't like it. my fault.
-canadiantire(轮胎-M.I.N.K.);
2005-6-13
(#2343407@0)
-
You think software == application. But there are others. The world is biger than you think, kid.
-ynxie2000(SurferInToronto);
2005-6-12
(#2342375@0)
-
Believe or not, what the assembler is toady is what C++ will be tomorrow.
事物总是要发展的吗!
-wukongjj(菁菁悟空);
2005-6-14
(#2346422@0)
-
I agree with you.
-goodchoice(body builder);
2005-6-14
(#2346492@0)
-
那要看发展到何种程度, C 与 C++的出现及其广泛的应用是有其合理及必然性的. 我的理解是只要电脑体系结构没能够跳出“诺依曼机”, C 和 C++就不会消亡.
-keepbugging(独行的猫);
2005-6-15
(#2347466@0)
-
c++/C会死？你拿什么写Linux,GNU soft,Gnome,KDE, Oracle,MySQL, Acrobat, MS office. 各种driver, firmware?java 不错，不过也就用在访问数据库的所谓 enterprise applications.
写写middleware, 慢点就慢点，安全最重要。
啥时候你见到 blizzard.com 把 starcraft 用 别的语言写了，再来谈C++死不死。这种问题还有人附和，真是怪了
-hillman(山大王);
2005-6-15
{209}
(#2346991@0)
-
a jokeAfter all, it should really be called ++C, since we only want to use a
language after it has been improved.
-kpax(kosmo);
2005-6-16
{108}
(#2349888@0)