This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
工作学习 / 学科技术讨论 / Very good paper for SOFEA ( Service-Oriented Front-End Architecture ) ! But I would like to know more about general framework for application access control and role assignment. Anyone knows it?
-bigfirebird(***);
2007-10-15
{2665}
(#3993006@0)
-
thanks...good post. will read it later...
-kqc(海市);
2007-10-15
(#3994041@0)
-
Definitely I cannot say it is b***s***, but actually it says nothing. There is no other front technology besides HTML/JavaScript (which it's vulnerable), and it says nothing about problems need to solved with rich client.
-liquid(avaya);
2007-10-16
(#3995395@0)
-
You can never implement role based access control on client side, and you will never see one.
-liquid(avaya);
2007-10-16
(#3995398@0)
-
Think again, then try to repeat what you said..?Well, on client side, definitely there is no one. But he was talking about whole system framework in general.
-nicetomeetyou(老兵，支持你，支持我);
2007-10-16
{109}
(#3995419@0)
-
I still repeat what I said because this has been thought for years. All those new words, SOFEA, SOA, AJAX, they are nothing new except javascript and xml, and they may be used in one kind of problem, but not general.
-liquid(avaya);
2007-10-16
(#3995637@0)
-
Javascript and XML are merely application-level scripting tool and communication packaging protocol. SOA is a conceptual enterprise application framework. It re-defines interfaces among different eco-systems which JS may or may not be resided on.
-nicetomeetyou(老兵，支持你，支持我);
2007-10-17
(#3996702@0)
-
SOA is merely a concept than a framework, IMO, it just defines how interface should be defined. To me, it is same like COM, defines interfaces and you don't care who, where and how the interface was implemented, and COM has been there for 15 years.
-liquid(avaya);
2007-10-17
(#3996843@0)
-
I agree. Here is an article to share from IBM: IBM SOA Foundation: An architectural introduction and overview
-nicetomeetyou(老兵，支持你，支持我);
2007-10-17
{475}
(#3996956@0)
-
I agree too :) SOA is good, but we need good framework that can help developers to implement them. COM is an excellent technology, and MS' COM+ is way better than EJB 2. I worked on both side for years and I still like COM+.
-liquid(avaya);
2007-10-17
(#3997243@0)
-
I don't quite buy it. COM is good for sure, but (1) It is a solution only inherenced with MS OS, cannot be implemented across multiple OS platforms. (2) It is really a headache nightmare to keep all DLLs' version update to date. DCOM??
-nicetomeetyou(老兵新传);
2007-10-17
(#3997814@0)
-
COM is OS independent. If there is implementation of COM library on Linux, COM objects running on Windows/Linux can call each other without knowing that. Keeping file up to date is same like others, there is no difference.
-liquid(avaya);
2007-10-17
(#3997884@0)
-
This is an interesting article telling about service-oriented (SO) design in COM technology. MS is pushing its .net, even though COM is still supported.
-nicetomeetyou(老兵新传);
2007-10-17
(#3998541@0)
-
Very genius idea and way to go !!! Correct the thin client architecture by implementing a true MVC framework on the client side, not a Front Controller-based framework on the web server. Use XML instead of JSON to respect data.
-nicetomeetyou(老兵新传);
2007-10-19
(#4002615@0)