本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛Thanks for you to share your smart way to diversify. It's really a necessary and perfect way to diversify if "never has less than 6 stocks and 10% cash". I totally agree.
IBM has put Service and Software to a high priority for a long time (since Gartner? came into the power). Since 1993(?) IBM Service and Software revenue surpass its hardware revenue. To many people surprise, IBM is the biggest software company in the world, not MS or CA. What you think is right, IBM is more like a service company, or consulting company, or software company than a hardware company. SUN, HP is trying to follow the pattern also.
One reason for me drop IBM down is that I don't know how large the service share is bundled with its old machines. In my humble opinion, one of the main reasons for JP Morgen deal is that JP is currently using a lot of IBM machines. However, as we know, the market share of IBM mainframe has been down for a while. I can't imagine a company with SUN's mainframe will buy IBM's service. This is the difference between IBM service and other pure service/software company like Accenture, SEBL, MS, or CA.
"My concern is it's pension reserve might be inadequate following the tech meltdown." You got the point. It seems to be the problems for most of the blue chips(GM, GE...). But I don't understand why even many Growth Funds hold large quantities of such companies' share. Don't they care or they have some other ways to solve the problem? I will see what will happen at last.
I'm so glad to know someone like you to share with us so many good think. Wish you a good return next year!更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
IBM has put Service and Software to a high priority for a long time (since Gartner? came into the power). Since 1993(?) IBM Service and Software revenue surpass its hardware revenue. To many people surprise, IBM is the biggest software company in the world, not MS or CA. What you think is right, IBM is more like a service company, or consulting company, or software company than a hardware company. SUN, HP is trying to follow the pattern also.
One reason for me drop IBM down is that I don't know how large the service share is bundled with its old machines. In my humble opinion, one of the main reasons for JP Morgen deal is that JP is currently using a lot of IBM machines. However, as we know, the market share of IBM mainframe has been down for a while. I can't imagine a company with SUN's mainframe will buy IBM's service. This is the difference between IBM service and other pure service/software company like Accenture, SEBL, MS, or CA.
"My concern is it's pension reserve might be inadequate following the tech meltdown." You got the point. It seems to be the problems for most of the blue chips(GM, GE...). But I don't understand why even many Growth Funds hold large quantities of such companies' share. Don't they care or they have some other ways to solve the problem? I will see what will happen at last.
I'm so glad to know someone like you to share with us so many good think. Wish you a good return next year!更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net