1. From a pure MBA point of view, I think, Rotman>Calgary+$10,000 scholarship. In fact, best MBA programs do not have a lot of scholarship at all.
2. About the question of how to justify the $60,000 cost if you choose Rotman, I think, it is really a very personally choice. If you think about long term return on investment, Rotman is probably a better choice. I mean if you choose Calgary, you may never land a 'good job'. As you mention in your posting, it maybe easier for a Rotman student to find a finance job simply because it is closest to Bay street.
3. If you really think you are not so aggresive(since most of the female MBAs I know are aggresive women), maybe Calgary is not a bad choice. The pro side of that programs is so obvious, scholarship, cheap tuition fee, don't need to relocate, etc.
Therefore, if I were you, I would definately choose (the stinking) Rotman.
2. About the question of how to justify the $60,000 cost if you choose Rotman, I think, it is really a very personally choice. If you think about long term return on investment, Rotman is probably a better choice. I mean if you choose Calgary, you may never land a 'good job'. As you mention in your posting, it maybe easier for a Rotman student to find a finance job simply because it is closest to Bay street.
3. If you really think you are not so aggresive(since most of the female MBAs I know are aggresive women), maybe Calgary is not a bad choice. The pro side of that programs is so obvious, scholarship, cheap tuition fee, don't need to relocate, etc.
Therefore, if I were you, I would definately choose (the stinking) Rotman.