×

Loading...
Ad by
  • 最优利率和cashback可以申请特批,好信用好收入offer更好。请点链接扫码加微信咨询,Scotiabank -- Nick Zhang 6478812600。
Ad by
  • 最优利率和cashback可以申请特批,好信用好收入offer更好。请点链接扫码加微信咨询,Scotiabank -- Nick Zhang 6478812600。

美国一位大佬公开支持川普总统。Bill Ackman.

I am going to formally endorse @realDonaldTrump. I came to this decision some time ago as many @X followers have already understood from my supportive posts of Trump and my criticisms of @POTUS Biden.

The reason why I have not yet formally done so is that I want to explain my thinking in detail and address the arguments put forth by others against Trump. I want to make the case thoughtfully and convincingly.

Today, when one announces an intention to support Trump, Biden supporters who know me tend to assume that I have lost it. I assure you that I have made this decision carefully, rationally, and by relying on as much empirical data as possible.

It will take a long-form post to explain my thinking. I might even break my own record. I just haven’t had the time nor felt the urgency to write the post as we are still a few months from the election.

I am explaining my conclusion now in response to many questions I have received on the topic so that I am formally on the record.

You of course don’t need to care about my opinion so feel free not to read my post when it appears. That said, I believe the upcoming presidential election is one of the most consequential elections in my lifetime so I am taking the proper time to articulate observations that I will share widely and for which I assume an important responsibility.

I have had the benefit of spending a few hours recently with President Trump so I will have some first hand observations to share.

As always, I respect everyone’s right to form and share their own views on this important topic.

Please keep an open mind on the upcoming presidential election. Bear in mind that your views on Trump have likely been dramatically affected if you have sourced your info on Trump from mainstream media or friends or family who have relied on mainstream media as a source of knowledge.

We have all recently learned in the starkest manner (the debate) how we cannot rely on the MSM as our source of truth on the ultimate political question.

Remember, media organizations are like sports teams that run plays chosen by their owners and executed by the coaches they hire. They are not unbiased arbiters of the truth.

Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

  • 枫下茶话 / 社会政治 / 川普总统歪了一下脑袋,子弹穿过他的耳朵!枪手绝对厉害!川普是上天派来的天使,任何人不能左右他! +6

    :

    • “我的66岁黑人祖母从来没有投票给任何共和党人,今天她说,几年要投票给共和党人川普总统。她说,民主党人已经失去了理智。” +7
      • 年轻呀
    • 美猴王:年过八旬,挨枪不倒,血流满面,举拳战斗,这才是我最敬佩,也是最值得我支持的总统,人民的总统,我的无人能替代的总统! +8


      :

      • 据说这照片是修的,现场后面没有国旗,是后加上去的,这么快就加了发新闻,挺敬业 +1
        • 可能。你说的有道理
        • 不是,有视频拍到这张照片的拍摄过程,记者也是豁出去了,在这么危险的情况下 +2
    • 评论:枪杀川普总统的前世与今生,以及华盛顿明天棋局。 +3

      评论:枪杀川普总统的前世与今生,以及华盛顿明天的棋局。

      111111(快乐老家)

      枪杀川普,是华盛顿建制派备用,但一直拒绝使用的工具,因为风险8太大,效果难以控制。之前,他们尝试通过法律诉讼,剥夺川普竞选人的资格,从而阻止川普的第二次白宫之路,确保白宫的权力,掌握在华盛顿建制派相信和认可的建制派政客手中。从FBI突袭川普庄园,到34项重罪的封口费案,再到美国最高法捍卫总统的独立性,都是华盛顿企图通过法律,将川普击倒的尝试。

      但最高法,以6:3的结果,击碎了建制派运作四年的司法棋局。针对川普的一系列司法诉讼,因为最高法对美国总统职务豁免权的捍卫而被瓦解粉碎。

      由此,宣告以司法狙击川普的布局,走向失败。

      一,必须阻止川普不惜枪杀的前世今生。

      但是,阻击川普再次入主白宫,是必须完成,同时又刻不容缓的任务。为什么?

      因为拜登政府的三个原罪,必须以阻止非建制派川普为保护,必须加以掩盖以保全拜登和整个建制派的利益和安全。

      原罪一,疫情溯源。新冠疫情是连接奥巴马和拜登两届政府的黑箱操作,国家卫生院福奇是代表人物。受困于美国的法律和道德限制,福奇通过资助石正丽实现了病毒功能增强,引发了波及世界的史无前例的大疫情。

      如果川普上台,牵涉奥巴马和拜登,以及华盛顿和美国医疗界的整个利益网络,会被解开,到时华盛顿会地动山摇。

      原罪二,2020大选摇摆州暂停计票。受困于美国各州的自治和独立法律,2020大选夜摇摆州的统一时间,集体暂停计票,成为美国历史上最黑暗的一天,完全颠覆了美国选举的性质。

      谁策划,谁组织,谁参与?

      如果真相被揭开,将涉及到美国宪政的动摇和联邦与各州的对立。

      必须阻止任何企图揭开大选暂停真相的解密。

      原罪三,阿富汗撤军溃败真相。13名美国士兵的生命,和60亿美元的美军装备,是拜登政府被塔利班开着丰田小皮卡,赶出阿富汗的耻辱代价。

      谁决策,谁组织,谁指挥?

      每一个真相,都是一个窝案。

      基于以上三个原罪,阻止川普,不但是民主党,也是共和党建制派一起的利益捆绑。所以针对川普的每一个行动,共和占多数的众议院,没有任何反对。

      以上,就是必须阻止川普,不惜使用最危险工具枪杀的前世与今生。

      第二,枪杀川普失败后,华盛顿明天的棋局。

      今天,是特勤局的失败。这个失败,包含两个意思,第一,是他们职责的失败,如此赤裸裸的枪杀,阿富汗的派出所都可以发现阻止,但特勤局则失败了。第二,如果是内部人作案,则是一次失败的行动。

      当华盛顿最危险的工具,枪杀使用但失败后,阻止川普的任务还在,下一步,他们要怎么做?

      司法道路,确定已经堵死。华盛顿不会再做尝试。

      再次枪杀,存在概率,但不高。为什么?因为川普一方会提高警惕防范而导致刺杀的成本与风险提高,整个事件最后泄露的可能性增大。但,依然是选项之一。

      最具可行性的,只能是他们已经使用过的选举系统漏洞。

      这本身是一个非常庞大的系统工程,同样存在着巨大的风险,因为共和党已经着手从选举过程入手以进行监督。

      但,阻止川普,是舍弃一切,都要完成的死任务。所以,明天,华盛顿的新棋局,依然围绕在川普自身的安全,和选举系统的漏洞,这两个点之上…

    • 美国一位大佬公开支持川普总统。Bill Ackman. +3

      I am going to formally endorse @realDonaldTrump. I came to this decision some time ago as many @X followers have already understood from my supportive posts of Trump and my criticisms of @POTUS Biden.

      The reason why I have not yet formally done so is that I want to explain my thinking in detail and address the arguments put forth by others against Trump. I want to make the case thoughtfully and convincingly.

      Today, when one announces an intention to support Trump, Biden supporters who know me tend to assume that I have lost it. I assure you that I have made this decision carefully, rationally, and by relying on as much empirical data as possible.

      It will take a long-form post to explain my thinking. I might even break my own record. I just haven’t had the time nor felt the urgency to write the post as we are still a few months from the election.

      I am explaining my conclusion now in response to many questions I have received on the topic so that I am formally on the record.

      You of course don’t need to care about my opinion so feel free not to read my post when it appears. That said, I believe the upcoming presidential election is one of the most consequential elections in my lifetime so I am taking the proper time to articulate observations that I will share widely and for which I assume an important responsibility.

      I have had the benefit of spending a few hours recently with President Trump so I will have some first hand observations to share.

      As always, I respect everyone’s right to form and share their own views on this important topic.

      Please keep an open mind on the upcoming presidential election. Bear in mind that your views on Trump have likely been dramatically affected if you have sourced your info on Trump from mainstream media or friends or family who have relied on mainstream media as a source of knowledge.

      We have all recently learned in the starkest manner (the debate) how we cannot rely on the MSM as our source of truth on the ultimate political question.

      Remember, media organizations are like sports teams that run plays chosen by their owners and executed by the coaches they hire. They are not unbiased arbiters of the truth.

    • 这种对某个领导人物狂热崇拜的想法很危险啊,美国不应该只是极度依赖于某个个人。集体领导,三权分立才是立国之本。治大国如烹小鲜。 +3
    • 犹太人也不行?泽连也不行? +1
    • 子弹没有穿过他的耳朵,穿过的话照片上耳朵不可能完好无损, 最多只是蹭了一下。当时川普趴在地上特勤人员问他话,他不停说where are my shoes, where are my shoes,哈哈哈。怎么会把鞋子丢了呢? +2
      • 可能
    • 神护川普,天佑美国! +4