×

Loading...
Ad by
  • 推荐 OXIO 加拿大高速网络,最低月费仅$40. 使用推荐码 RCR37MB 可获得一个月的免费服务
Ad by
  • 推荐 OXIO 加拿大高速网络,最低月费仅$40. 使用推荐码 RCR37MB 可获得一个月的免费服务

帮楼主找到原版文字了,4 例死亡与免疫接种有因果关系,不知道能否做为讨论问题的基础?

Deaths

  • Up to and including January 6, 2023, a total of 400 reports with an outcome of death were reported following vaccination. Although these deaths occurred after being vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine, they are not necessarily related to the vaccine.
  • Medical case review previously used the WHO-UMC causality assessment categories to classify the status of death reports. Updated WHO guidance on causality assessment specific to vaccinations has been released. This updated user guide more accurately represents causality assessments following vaccination, so all reports with an outcome of death were updated and reclassified using the new classification system.
  • Of the 400 death reports, it was not possible to assess causality for 104 reports due to missing information (not enough information to initiate causality assessment).
  • Preliminary causality assessment was possible for the remaining 296 cases where there was sufficient information. Using the available information and the WHO guidance on causality assessment specific to vaccinations, we’ve determined that:
    • 155 reports of death were unclassifiable due to lack of available information (not enough information to complete the preliminary assessment)
    • 97 reports of death were inconsistent with causal association to the vaccine (unlikely to be linked to the vaccine)
    • 40 reports of death were indeterminate (insufficient definitive evidence or conflicting evidence for causality)
    • 4 deaths were consistent with causal association to immunization (see ACCA webpage)
  • If additional information becomes available, cases will be re-assessed, and the causality assessment may be updated.
Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

  • 枫下家园 / 医药保健 / Health Canada 认为这 200 人死亡是因为疫苗。Health Canada 也成了“反疫苗”了? +6
    • 死多少算多啊?死多少才能引起加拿大政府关注疫苗灾难啊?由此可见,加拿大政府不关心加拿大人的生命,更不会关心你的生活水平了。 +2
    • 推特认为的名气会更响,那是世界顶级舆论媒体 +2
      • “Health Canada 认为”,不是推特认为。你在揉脸说的话不代表“肉联认为”。这点脑子应该有 +6
        • Health Canada 认为就没有官方页面?这点脑力还是要进一步开发
          • 你去问 Toronto Sun. 你不会没听说过 Toronto Sun 吧? +4
            • 推特比SUN厉害不?我只是想看原版
    • 健康人打针打死了,都成了代价,太--不要脸了! +12
    • 疫苗拯救的人没人统计一下? +1
      • 加拿大政府统计了,疫苗救人无招,杀人有方:加拿大病毒变弱疫苗普及的2021/2022新增死亡1.7万,20年来最高!之前新增死亡最高1.5万,还不是病毒最强没有疫苗的2020/2021。 +4
        • 反疫苗的之前拼命否定加拿大有多死人,现在突然承认的确是多死人了,但是是疫苗造成的。这剧本要经常换也不容易呀。
          • 你这脑子,打100针我都信。。。。。“突然承认的确是多死人了,但是是疫苗造成的”,这是换剧本?这是从来不换剧本!倒是爱疫苗的经常换,口罩一会无效一会有效,一会一个管用一会两个才管用。。。。 +6
            • 我打多少针和你有啥关系了,你有种生病别看医生去,多吃点兽药和消毒水就好了。科学的的东西是不断认知的,你看看物理就知道,传统力学,量子力学。
    • 实际上 Health Canada 一直都在公布疫苗副作用报告的统计数据,截至1月6日,共收到接种疫苗后死亡报告400个。 +1

      我以为,科学的态度是,收到报告后,进行调查,以确定是不是疫苗导致的。

      我还以为,那些听到一起死亡案例就首先往疫苗副作用上联想的,属于疫苗恐惧症的症状。

      • 是不是同意你的看法放一边,先表扬你表达时候用了一个"我以为"。这是讨论问题的基础。
      • 帮楼主找到原版文字了,4 例死亡与免疫接种有因果关系,不知道能否做为讨论问题的基础?

        Deaths

        • Up to and including January 6, 2023, a total of 400 reports with an outcome of death were reported following vaccination. Although these deaths occurred after being vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine, they are not necessarily related to the vaccine.
        • Medical case review previously used the WHO-UMC causality assessment categories to classify the status of death reports. Updated WHO guidance on causality assessment specific to vaccinations has been released. This updated user guide more accurately represents causality assessments following vaccination, so all reports with an outcome of death were updated and reclassified using the new classification system.
        • Of the 400 death reports, it was not possible to assess causality for 104 reports due to missing information (not enough information to initiate causality assessment).
        • Preliminary causality assessment was possible for the remaining 296 cases where there was sufficient information. Using the available information and the WHO guidance on causality assessment specific to vaccinations, we’ve determined that:
          • 155 reports of death were unclassifiable due to lack of available information (not enough information to complete the preliminary assessment)
          • 97 reports of death were inconsistent with causal association to the vaccine (unlikely to be linked to the vaccine)
          • 40 reports of death were indeterminate (insufficient definitive evidence or conflicting evidence for causality)
          • 4 deaths were consistent with causal association to immunization (see ACCA webpage)
        • If additional information becomes available, cases will be re-assessed, and the causality assessment may be updated.
      • 那个打完疫苗当场死亡的妇女,第二天政府就宣布死于自然原因,请问经过尸检了吗?这不算在那400个里吧? +3
      • 原来只要体内带新冠病菌的,死了就算新冠死亡;秉承这种“科学精神”,只要体内有针剂的,死了也应该算疫苗死亡啊。 +2
      • 2018年到2019年加拿大64岁以下的成年人,每年有54k多人死亡,即劳动力人口每天约死150人,只要他们是接种疫苗之后死的,按反疫苗人士的原则,都可以说是疫苗造成的。