897102(路人甲的假马甲)
Death rates are calculated as the number of deaths in each group, divided by the total number of people in this group. This is given per 100,000 people.
(#15089873@0)
Last Updated: 2023-1-8
This post has been archived. It cannot be replied.
Replies, comments and Discussions:
-
枫下家园 / 医药保健 / 按照蓝天网友提供的链接，英国的按照疫苗接种状态的新冠死亡统计如下
-897102(路人甲的假马甲);
2023-1-8
{336}
(#15089848@0)
+3
注：这才是新冠死亡统计 Deaths involving COVID-19。我只挑选了三组数据比较，有心人可以去那个链接自己看看。
:
-
顺便搜了一下美国的情况，这里有现成的图表，这是50岁以上人群。
-897102(路人甲的假马甲);
2023-1-8
{199}
(#15089868@0)
+1
:
-
65岁以上人群。
-897102(路人甲的假马甲);
2023-1-8
{608}
(#15089873@0)
Death rates are calculated as the number of deaths in each group, divided by the total number of people in this group. This is given per 100,000 people.
-
不可信
-111111(快乐老家);
2023-1-8
(#15089885@0)
+1
-
不打疫苗的有多死1倍的风险
-xiaozuiba(xiaozuiba);
2023-1-8
(#15090001@0)
-
不可信
-111111(快乐老家);
2023-1-8
(#15089884@0)
+1
-
不可信
-111111(快乐老家);
2023-1-8
(#15089881@0)
+1
-
All cause死亡率能看到疫苗正作用和负作用综合起来，作用是正的还是负的。
-blueskygg(Grass);
2023-1-8
{595}
(#15090052@0)
-
为什么死亡一定就是与疫苗或者新冠有关系的？不考虑其他因素了吗？比如，打了疫苗的到处浪，出车祸的概率要比不打疫苗躲在家里的高，这算是疫苗的副作用？
-897102(路人甲的假马甲);
2023-1-8
(#15090061@0)
+2
-
有教授研究结果，不打疫苗的车祸率高呢。闲得蛋疼，不如研究一下打不打疫苗对慢性病人有什么影响，死亡率会增加还是减少。
-blueskygg(Grass);
2023-1-8
(#15090124@0)
+3
-
你如果能找到数据，我也可以研究。
-897102(路人甲的假马甲);
2023-1-8
(#15090152@0)
+1
-
每个国家第一波死亡的都是老人和有基础病，很无奈，死亡率都偏高，之后死亡率都会显著下降，你这个链接很难说明什么
-eragon(eragon);
2023-1-8
(#15090213@0)
+1
