×

Loading...
Ad by
  • 最优利率和cashback可以申请特批，好信用好收入offer更好。请点链接扫码加微信咨询，Scotiabank -- Nick Zhang 6478812600。
Ad by
  • 最优利率和cashback可以申请特批，好信用好收入offer更好。请点链接扫码加微信咨询，Scotiabank -- Nick Zhang 6478812600。

@Florida

Please read the FDA document directly. It admits “Covid” PCR test was developed without isolated samples for test calibration, effectively admitting it’s testing something else.

uws(United We Sell)

A document just released by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) openly admits that the infamous PCR test for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) was developed not with actual samples, but rather with what appears to be genetic material from a common cold virus.

In the FDA document, it is clearly stated that ordinary seasonal flu genetic material was used as the testing marker in the PCR test kits because the authorities knew that many people would test “positive” for it, thus allowing them to use these results to create the “Covid” narrative.

It is somewhat of a lengthy read, but have a look for yourself and see the deception in plain sight. There is no legitimate test out there that accurately identifies the presence of SARS-CoV-2. From the document:

“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.”

Another revelation in the document is the admission by the FDA that test results are “pooled” together to produce numbers that are inaccurate. The FDA is quite literally manufacturing data to support a false narrative.

We are now at a crossroads worldwide. The time is upon us to decide if we are going to allow this type of medical fascism to persist, and impact upon the futures of our children. Or if we are finally going to say no to tyrannical government policy.

You can DOWNLOAD THE DOCUMENT HERE:

https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

(#14204244@0)
Last Updated: 2021-12-21
This post has been archived. It cannot be replied.
Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

  • 枫下家园 / 医药保健 / PCR试剂采用普通flu病毒作检测指标意味着什么？ -uws(United We Sell); 2021-12-21 {1184} (#14204101@0) +4

    根据FDA公开的资料，PCR试剂的检测指标采用的是普通flu病毒。这引出了不少问题。

    1，得covid的人，鼻内会出现flu病毒蛋白

    2，得flu的人，PCR检测会是阳性，自动被归类成covid病人。这解释了为什么去年冬天"没有flu".

    3，目前检测covid的最主要手段是PCR。但是，PCR阳性的所谓covid，其中有数目不详的flu.

    4，目前所谓的得过covid之后重复感染的病例，有可能是：第一次是flu第二次还是flu; 第一次是以covid第二次还是covid; 第一次是flu第二次是covid; 第一次是covid第二次是flu. 具体是什么情形，按照现在已有的检测手段，科学界和医学界似乎没有办法确认。

    5，实际上的covid染病数量肯定比公布的少。因为公布的是以PCR为基准，其中包含了flu病例。至于少多少，这是一个未知数。也许可以用2019年以前历年flu病例数量估算。

    6，flu也是会死人的。所以，公布的covid死亡人数，其中包含了flu死亡人数。至于有多少死于真正的covid有多少死于flu，也是一个未知数。也许也可以用2019年以前历年flu死亡数量估算。

    7，在covid出现以前，对flu的死亡原因归类比较合理。比如，横穿马路被车撞死的，如果当时患flu, 不会被归类为因flu死亡。这一点和covid很不一样。CDC的covid死亡人数包含了PCR阳性但是死于物理原因的。

    8，用于治疗covid的有效药物ivermectin, 也许同时可以用于治疗flu.

    • 一笔糊涂帐 -jackliu8688(Jack); 2021-12-21 (#14204126@0) +4
    • 这种胡说八道的帖子都能上精华我也是服了。新冠pcr是找新冠分子，flu pcr是找flu分子。就像x光能照胸片也能照脚片，也不会肋骨骨折看成脚骨骨折 -tzm_oasis(绿洲); 2021-12-21 (#14204158@0) +17
      • Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing -jackliu8688(Jack); 2021-12-21 {321} (#14204170@0) +6
        • 新的检测方法能同时检测流感和新冠，并不是两种结果混一起，而是同时出两种结果，效率更高，你这是赞美CDC吗？ -tzm_oasis(绿洲); 2021-12-21 (#14204619@0) +1
          • 你也太一厢情愿了。这里是说大名鼎鼎的PCR不能区分COVID与FLU。 -jackliu8688(Jack); 2021-12-21 (#14204624@0) +5
            • "PCR不能区分COVID与FLU" 请给出原文， 新方法 “testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save both time and resources as we head into influenza season” -tzm_oasis(绿洲); 2021-12-21 (#14204644@0) +1
              • CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. -jackliu8688(Jack); 2021-12-21 (#14204703@0) +3
                • can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses你说成不能区分covid和flu。你把翻译结果求反再贴出来，真有你的 -tzm_oasis(绿洲); 2021-12-21 (#14204828@0)
                  • CDC也是要面子的，这是用一种体面的方式承认这破烂事。 -jackliu8688(Jack); 2021-12-21 (#14204836@0) +4
                  • CDC要求的新方法才是can，也就是说老方法can't。 -blueskygg(Grass); 2021-12-21 (#14204882@0) +4
                    • flu pcr老方法早在covid出现前很多年就有了，如果那时候就能检测到covid那你也太看得起cdc了 -tzm_oasis(绿洲); 2021-12-21 (#14204957@0)
                      • 老方法指的是去年开始用的检测新冠的方法。 -blueskygg(Grass); 2021-12-21 (#14205067@0)
                        • flu变种比covid多得多，如果既能测covid又能测flu，工作量比只检测covid要大很多倍，这种猜测有什么证据？ -tzm_oasis(绿洲); 2021-12-21 (#14205086@0)
      • https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download -uws(United We Sell); 2021-12-21 {193} (#14204246@0) +1
        • 文章说是用转录rna，你说是用something else。你还说用普通感冒病毒检测。造谣没底线 -tzm_oasis(绿洲); 2021-12-21 (#14204607@0) +3
        • Page 10: Equivalence and performance of these extraction platforms for extraction of viral RNA were demonstrated with the CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel (K190302). -uws(United We Sell); 2021-12-21 {422} (#14204736@0) +1

          Performance characteristics of these extraction platforms with 2019-nCoV (SARS CoV-2) have NOT been demonstrated.

          Page 15:

          Equivalence and performance of the following extraction platforms were demonstrated with the CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel (K190302) and based on those data are acceptable for use with the CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.

      • 辟谣太累了 -micah(mica); 2021-12-21 (#14204375@0) +2
        • 辟谣干啥？谣就是谣，时间机器会自动辟谣的 -utgfxval3(蛙); 2021-12-21 (#14204505@0)
        • 造谣动动嘴，辟谣跑断腿 -moonhalf(减肥减多久); 2021-12-21 (#14204923@0) +1
      • 请问，您这里说的“新冠分子，flu分子”，分子指的是molecule吗？ -uws(United We Sell); 2021-12-21 (#14204653@0)
        • 分子是我对原文中molecular的直译。所谓新冠分子就是新冠rna分子级别上的表达，或者说rna的分子组合 -tzm_oasis(绿洲); 2021-12-21 (#14204689@0)
    • Please read the FDA document directly. It admits “Covid” PCR test was developed without isolated samples for test calibration, effectively admitting it’s testing something else. -uws(United We Sell); 2021-12-21 {2064} (#14204244@0) +1

      A document just released by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) openly admits that the infamous PCR test for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) was developed not with actual samples, but rather with what appears to be genetic material from a common cold virus.

      In the FDA document, it is clearly stated that ordinary seasonal flu genetic material was used as the testing marker in the PCR test kits because the authorities knew that many people would test “positive” for it, thus allowing them to use these results to create the “Covid” narrative.

      It is somewhat of a lengthy read, but have a look for yourself and see the deception in plain sight. There is no legitimate test out there that accurately identifies the presence of SARS-CoV-2. From the document:

      “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.”

      Another revelation in the document is the admission by the FDA that test results are “pooled” together to produce numbers that are inaccurate. The FDA is quite literally manufacturing data to support a false narrative.

      We are now at a crossroads worldwide. The time is upon us to decide if we are going to allow this type of medical fascism to persist, and impact upon the futures of our children. Or if we are finally going to say no to tyrannical government policy.

      You can DOWNLOAD THE DOCUMENT HERE:

      https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

      • "something else" 是 “tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA” 中文翻译 "用体外转录的全长RNA的特征片段进行测试”。根本就不是用感冒病毒测试 -tzm_oasis(绿洲); 2021-12-21 {204} (#14204389@0) +1

        另外用转录基因片段进行测试也是唯一可行的方法。必须先有测试手段才能分离新冠病毒。没有测试手段怎么知道分离出的病毒是新冠病毒？用转录基因也是最可靠的测试方法。病人身上提取的样本很可能含有其他病毒会干扰测试
    • 你的意思是意味着有阴谋在里面？ -winterfish(潜水鱼(\ (•◡•) /)); 2021-12-21 (#14204251@0)
      • 我是科学家，只作科学领域的分析。 -uws(United We Sell); 2021-12-21 (#14204306@0)
        • 科学家分析出来FDA明目张胆地欺骗，看来懂英文就行了，不需要什么科学知识。揉脸真是个好地方，每天都能学习新技能。 -winterfish(潜水鱼(\ (•◡•) /)); 2021-12-21 (#14204322@0) +2
          • 本科学家就事论事，上文从头到尾没有使用“欺骗”这个词。 -uws(United We Sell); 2021-12-21 (#14204365@0)
    • 谣言，英文辟谣网站： -tzm_oasis(绿洲); 2021-12-21 {672} (#14204392@0) +6
      Social media users have claimed that a document from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) admits that the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is the name for the novel coronavirus, does not exist. While the document is authentic, the scientific process described...
      Full Story:
      https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-cdc-idUSKBN27633R
      • 主流的fact check=lie -itwriting(halfpercent); 2021-12-21 (#14204408@0) +13
        • 看过不少主流媒体的辟谣，一般都是树个稻草人打，然后自己顺便再造点谣。 -blueskygg(Grass); 2021-12-21 (#14204803@0) +3
      • 主贴没说covid病毒不存在，你这辟谣辟错地方了 -jackliu8688(Jack); 2021-12-21 (#14204548@0) +7
    • 可能一般人不知道PCR的原理。即使COVID跟Flu病毒有部分相同的序列，使用不同的引物完全可以区分的开。技术上大家完全没有必要担心。 -zellner(骈邑山人); 2021-12-22 (#14206205@0)

More Topics

  • 路易斯安那州众议院通过了一项决议，呼吁卫生部调查该州过去10年发生的婴儿猝死综合症(sIDS)事件，并将每份报告与儿童的疫苗接种史进行比较。
  • 罗伯特·弗朗西斯·甘迺迪说: “1月20日，特朗普政府将命令美国所有供水系统从公共水中去除氟化物。“氟化物是一种工业废物，与关节炎、骨折、骨癌、智商损失、神经发育障碍和甲状腺疾病有关。”
  • 有没有比较好用和方便的water flosser推荐吗? waterpik那个看上去太大和复杂.
  • 科技这么先进了?
  • 大家对饮用弱碱性水，有经验分享，或者建议吗？
    • 枫下论坛主坛 /  枫下家园 /  医药保健